I Let an AI Redesign My Living Room. Here's What Happened
- Journalising Designers
- 1 day ago
- 2 min read

"I gave an AI tool a photo of my living room and asked it to redesign it. It took eleven seconds."
Eleven seconds. I've spent longer than that deciding on a throw pillow.
I wasn't testing it to replace myself. I was testing it because half my students ask about it now, and I didn't have a real answer yet.
So I gave it the actual brief I'd give a client. Small living room, one window, north facing, a sofa that isn't going anywhere because we just bought it.
The first version came back looking like every other AI living room I'd seen online. Warm oak, a boucle chair, a monstera in the corner. Nice. Also nowhere.
It hadn't looked at my window. My room gets almost no direct light, and the render was full of golden afternoon sun that will never once happen in that space.
That's the part nobody mentions when they call this stuff a game changer. It doesn't know my room. It knows a million photos of rooms that looked good in photos.
So I gave it more to work with. Actual dimensions. The direction the window faces. A photo taken at 4pm, the real light, not the brochure light.
The second version was better. It suggested a mirror opposite the window to bounce what little light I do get, which is a real technique, not a decorative guess.
It also suggested built-in shelving that would've blocked the one radiator in the room. I only caught that because I know what a radiator looks like from the side.
That's the actual finding, if I'm honest about it. The tool is fast at generating options and slow at understanding a room's constraints, the ones you only know by standing in it.
It's a good first pass. It is not a substitute for someone who has stood in your actual room, at 4pm, with the actual light hitting the actual wall.
I ended up using one idea from it, the mirror, and none of the rest.
Which feels like the honest ratio. Not zero, not everything, one good idea out of a stack of fast ones.
The room got slightly better because of a tool that took eleven seconds and a person who spent three weeks checking its work.
I don't think that's a story about AI replacing design. I think it's a story about what still can't be automated, the part where someone actually looks at the radiator. Journalising Designers Esha Bhandari


